The Woodcock Email to Fauci Reveals How Anti-Vaccine Propaganda is Created
The Real Truth About Vaccines
Not surprisingly, even though their last big reveal was a dud, Senator Ron Johnson, Senator Rand Paul, and not a medical doctor Maryanne Demasi are pitching a new conspiracy theory about Anthony Fauci.
This time, they want you to think that he knew about and was concealing flaws in the COVID vaccine safety monitoring systems.
The Woodcock Email to Fauci Reveals How Anti-Vaccine Propaganda is Created
How are they doing that?
This time Senator Ron Johnson and Senator Rand Paul want you to think that an email exchange between Dr. Janet Woodcock, then-acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, and Anthony Fauci means that she was sounding some kind of alarm about undetected problems.
Instead, it is obvious that the email exchange seems to be about ‘psychological reactions’ and not true adverse reactions.
These ‘psychological reactions’ are the types of reactions and problems that aren’t usually detected by VAERS or other safety systems.
These ‘psychological reactions’ are the types of reactions and problems that are expected when hundreds of millions of people get a vaccine!
And the obvious reason that industry would not support research on these folks?
It’s not because they want to hide anything, as anti-vaccine influencers want you to believe.
It is simply because these are psychological reactions and are not caused by their vaccines!
Also, the idea that the problems that would fester and come back to bite us later is not that more folks would have reactions to the COVID vaccines, but rather that more people would blame the COVID vaccines for their problems, leading to an increase in vaccine hesitancy.
So basically, this is another dud from Sens. Johnson and Paul - just like those texts from Anthony Fauci’s phone.
It’s just more propaganda that is being laundered across the social media accounts of anti-vaccine influencers.
What about the idea that Woodcock’s email justifies MIT Professor Retsef Levi’s vaccine injury plans?
They don’t, after all, Levi’s plans were all blocked.
“By May 2021, some of the most senior officials in the U.S. health bureaucracy had been explicitly warned that existing surveillance systems could miss the kinds of chronic, complex illnesses patients were reporting.”
Maryanne Demasi
And while one person was pushing for expansion of the existing surveillance systems using a new algorithm for VAERS, many of the signals they supposedly could uncover in VAERS weren’t ever found in subsequent studies!
Oh, and Studies Were Done!
Lastly, folks should know that studies were actually done on the types of reactions and problems that Janet Woodcock was talking about!
For example, studies found substantial rates of adverse events in the placebo arms of the COVID vaccine studies, including one with an inert placebo.
“We found that 76.0% of systemic AEs and 24.3% of local AEs after the first vaccination could be attributed to nocebo responses.”
Frequency of Adverse Events in the Placebo Arms of COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
Also, studies were done and they did not find strong signals to associate getting a COVID vaccine with developing:
POTS/dysautomia
small-fiber neuropathy
chronic fatigue/ME-CFS-like illness
brain fog
tinnitus
autoimmune disease
psychiatric disorders
Researchers have looked to see if COVID vaccines have caused unexpected, long-term reactions, and except for a few rare conditions, they don’t.
So, yet again, there is no smoking gun in the email that Senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul have released.
Instead, all we have is more fuel for anti-vaccine influencers to fan the flame of vaccine hesitancy and scare more people away from getting vaccinated and protected.