Anti-vaccine influencers have done a reanalysis of FDA clinical data for mFLUSIVA, the new mRNA flu vaccine.
Can you guess what they found?
About that Reanalysis of FDA Clinical Data for mFLUSIVA…
Of course, these folks who think that all vaccines are poison, concluded that “The mFLUSIVA approval should be withdrawn for both age indications and distribution halted.”
Why?
It’s because they believe that “The risk-benefit profile is extremely unfavorable.”
And how did they come to that conclusion?
They make their risk-benefit calculation look much worse by treating unexplained statistical differences as vaccine-caused deaths and by counting temporary side effects alongside serious influenza outcomes without adequately accounting for how severe each outcome is.
Basically, Peter McCullough and Nicolas Hulscher have grossly misrepresented the clinical data in the mFLUSIVA study.
And they have created more preprint propaganda on Zenodo to try and scare people away from getting vaccinated and protected.
More propaganda that people should ignore.
Peter and Friends aren't above using AI-generated studies to promote their business, so this isn't at all surprising. I wrote an article a while ago about them doing just that.
https://drewdespereaux.substack.com/p/focal-points-is-lying-to-you-to-take?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=63rclf
And yet they still somehow got 926 likes.
Don't assume that all deaths come from vaccines, Peter McCoughLung.