Discussion about this post

User's avatar
weirdbobdobbs10's avatar

89 likes seems to be low.

Still a dangerous claim, but a small audience (as of the time the photo of the post was taken) seems to be small.

Still respect you for making this into an article.

Mike S's avatar

The antivaxers always talk about herd immunity as though it’s a wonderful thing that can protect the vulnerable… but only when the herd immunity is “natural”, disease-derived.

But when we talk about vaccine-derived herd immunity to protect the vulnerable, they go into apoplectic shock, denying it is a thing.

…Just another manifestation of their hypocrisy.

PS: I’m thinking those with allergic reactions to MMR will presumably all have had one dose, and I’m presuming it still worked, so they will have a degree of protection, right? (This would be around 95%?)

No posts

Ready for more?