Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike S's avatar

Antivaxers deliberately conflate mortality and morbidity.

They cite mortality data, implying vaccines aren’t important because, as you point out, improved medical care and nutrition were major players in reducing mortality.

But if the diseases themselves don’t go away they still cause considerable morbidity and a degree of mortality remains inevitable.

Improved public health, sanitation and hygiene will impact primarily on feco-oral disease transmission, but nothing will stop kids being kids and their liberal dissemination of bodily fluids to their infant playmates, and nothing will stop transmission of disease spread by the respiratory route.

Which is exactly why diseases like measles, pertussis, mumps, rubella, HiB, chickenpox, pneumococcus, meningitis, influenza, diphtheria remained frequent (or even universal) in children in the prevax era.

It took vaccines to eliminate or reduce these, and if you don’t get the disease, you can’t die from it. If you are vaccinated but still get the disease despite that, then you are also much less likely to get severely affected or to die, compared to if you were never vaccinated.

Antivaxers will never tell you this, although they know it. They refuse to acknowledge the truth. They tell people not to vaccinate, saying it is harmful and that it won’t help you. They are lying.

No posts

Ready for more?